| DWY: Driving While Yakking
|
"DWY,"
or "Driving While Yakking," is causing an increasing number of motor
vehicle accidents, but experts say it's the act of conversation - not the phone
itself - that distracts drivers.
Will
the Nation, Like California, Hang Up and Drive?
The
stereotype of a California driver has always included a cell phone held to the
ear, but that might change soon. A law banning the use of handheld cellular
phones while operating a motor vehicle in California will take effect July 1,
2008.
Officially known as the California Wireless Telephone Automobile Safety Act of
2006, the new Golden State law mandates a base fine of $20 for a first offense
and $50 for each subsequent offense. California drivers will still be permitted
to have a wireless conversation while driving if they use hands-free
technology, such as a Bluetooth device.
In signing the bill, Governor Schwarzenegger said, "The simple fact is
it's dangerous to talk on your cell phone while driving. CHP [California
Highway Patrol] data show that cell phones are the No. 1 cause of
distracted-driving accidents. The 'Hands-Free' cell phone bill will save
lives."
But it's not that simple. All the safety experts we interviewed for this story
insisted that switching from handheld to hands-free phones will not negate the
inherent risk of driving while having a cell phone conversation.
"It's the intellectual distraction of the conversation itself that's at
fault," said Mantill Williams, AAA's national director of public affairs.
Russ Rader, spokesman for the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS),
agreed. "The risk is the same whether using hands-free or handheld,"
Rader said. "Our study in 2005 confirmed that the risk of injury was four
times higher [than not phoning while driving], whether using hands-free or
handheld." IIHS's
data lines up exactly with a 1997 study by the University of Toronto, which
concluded that "the risk of collision when using a cellular phone was four
times higher than the risk when the cellular phone was not being used."
Driver distraction, which includes cell phone use, is estimated to be
responsible for a minimum of 25 percent of all motor vehicle accidents. But
that estimate is quite low, according to AAA's Williams. Another expert, who
chose to remain off the record, said that that figure "could be much closer
to 50 percent."
Rader was quick to add that there might even be a hidden danger in laws like
California's. "[These laws] don't take into account the full scope of the
problem - and they imply that hands-free is safe, when it is not."
Still, many experts consider the jury still out on cell phone safety, if for no
other reason than the scarcity of data. According to the National Conference of
State Legislatures (NCSL), which tracks such data, as of June 2005, only 12
states - California, Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New York,
Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin - had published data on
the number of crashes that cited phones or CB radios as their cause. Also,
according to NCSL, as of 2005, 39 states had proposed some form of
distracted-driver legislation, most with provisions concerning handheld phones.
But things are heating up. Bills that completely ban cell phone usage while
driving are pending in four states: Massachusetts, New Jersey, Ohio and
Pennsylvania. Handheld bills are pending in Massachusetts, Michigan and Ohio.
Where does this leave us? If "As California goes, so goes the nation"
is still true, the new law could have a long-reaching ripple effect across the
cellular landscape of America. Or maybe not. At present, only four other states
- Connecticut, the District of Columbia, New Jersey and New York - have similar
laws on the books, and many prognosticators are taking a wait-and-see attitude
about the impact of the new California law.
Read on
|
| SBIS Team Runs to Find a Cure
|
Created in 1993 the EIF Revlon Run/Walk For Women has grown to become one of
the nation's largest 5K fundraising events. To date, the Run/Walks (LA/NY) have
distributed nearly 50 million dollars for cancer research, counseling, and
outreach programs. Thanks in part to these funds, new treatments are being
developed and lives are being saved.
On Saturday, May 10th our organization is participating in the EIF Revlon
Run/Walk For Women. We will be raising money collectively for the fight against
women's cancers. You can help our team reach its fundraising goal by sponsoring
a team member. To learn more log on to ? Click here to donate to the Brooks Team
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
Two
new laws dealing with the use of wireless telephones while driving go into
effect July 1, 2008. Below is a list of 'Frequently Asked Questions' concerning
these new laws.
Q:
When do the new wireless telephone laws take effect?
A:
The new laws take effect July 1, 2008
Q:
What is the difference between the two laws?
A:
The first prohibits all drivers from using a handheld wireless telephone while
operating a motor vehicle. (Vehicle Code (VC) §23123). Motorists 18 and over
may use a hands-free device. Drivers under the age of 18 may NOT use a wireless
telephone or hands-free device while operating a motor vehicle(VC §23124).
Q:
What if I need to use my telephone during an emergency, and I do not have a
hands- free device?
A:
The law allows a driver to use a wireless telephone to make emergency calls to
a law enforcement agency, a medical provider, the fire department, or other
emergency services agency.
Q:
What are the fines if I'm convicted?
A:
The base fine for the FIRST offense is $20 and $50 for subsequent convictions.
According to the Uniform Bail and Penalty Schedule, with the addition of
penalty assessments, a first offense is $76 and a second offense is $190.
Q:
Will I receive a point on my drivers license if I'm convicted for a violation
of the wireless telephone law?
A:
NO. The violation is a reportable offense: however, DMV will not assign a
violation point.
Q:
Will the conviction appear on my driving record?
A:
Yes, but the violation point will not be added.
I also
urge you to check with us first, in the event another agent for the company is
offering you what appears to be a better rate. Not all policies are
alike! We will review the new quote to make sure you are still receiving
the best combination of price and protection.
You
may reach me at (800) 915-3090 Ext. 870 if you need an immediate response, or send me an eMail. |

 |
|
|
|
|